The new leader, or is he?

Today Chicago woke up to a tweet from Jimmy Johnson from Fox Sports, as well as the guy that lead the Dallas Cowboys to multiple Super Bowls, but more famously known for his perfect head of hair. In this tweet Jimmy claims that the Bears have hired Marc Trestman of the Montreal Alouettes, and a man that lead the likes of Rich Gannon and Steve Young to career and MVP years.

Jimmy is tapped into the NFL and knows both coaches mentioned very well. Jimmy also has no reason to put this information out there without there having some legs to the story. However there is a lot of doubt around Chicago and the league if this is indeed accurate.

Phil Emery, the Chicago Bears General Manager, has stated a very specific interview process and he reportedly has interviews scheduled throughout the weekend with other candidates. This would completely throw out that plan. Could the Bears and Emery be so overly impressed by Trestman that they threw out the script and are jumping on a hire? Could Trestman be strong arming the Bears forcing a move? Could this be a stunt that a longtime friend in Johnson is doing to help Trestman in negotiations with other opportunities?

I can't answer that.

After initially thinking this is the worst case scenario for the Bears, and laughably the most likely. The Bears, one of the most storied franchises in all the land, go out and grab the most under the radar, least likely to succeed coach. Seems that this has been their approach on so many other occasions, Dave Wannstedt, Dick Juron, and even Lovie Smith was a relatively unknown guy. But, after looking at his resume, and seeing what others are saying about Trestman, he just might be the perfect fit for this franchise.

*Courtesy of the Chicago Sun Times and Neil Hayes

 

Trestman is an offensive genius (as described by some), a Quarterback guru, would instantly give the Bears validity on the offensive side of the ball, and by all reports elevate the play of Jay Cutler. That's the most important part right? Elevating the play of Jay Cutler?

 

Some around the league do not think that Jay is willing to elevate his play. They have decided that all he wants to do is run around, buy time, and showcase a big arm. This is especially the sediment of Troy Aikman, another Fox Sports employee, and notable QB as well. Troy has been wishy washy on Cutler over the years, at times backing the QB, and others calling him out. Recently Troy has gone on record saying Culter is who he is, and doesn't look interested in changing.

 

I take into account what some analyists say, but often times I discredit statements since they aren't around the team, haven't listened to the players, haven't seen them throughout a month, season, career. I see the Jay Cutler that goes out there and competes, and competes to win. A guy that expects excellence from his teammates, and expects them to be where he expects them to be and produce at a high level. Should Jay's lack of production be placed on those around him, or is it on Jay himself for not elevating the play of others?

 

I think there is a little blame to be placed on everyone, but mostly the finger needs to be pointed at the organization. The organization pulled the trigger on the deal to bring Jay Cutler, franchise Quarterback, to Chicago, but since he has been here they have added 1 offensive piece and subtracted multiple more. Jay hasn't had 3 consecutive seasons working in the same offense in his career. He has had multiple coaches and voices teaching him the game, which typically leaves it up to the player to pull what he's learned and interpret that information.

 

A guy like Marc Trestman instantly gives the Bears an offensive presence and identity. He would also answer the questions people have on Jay Culter. That is eventually what we, as Bears fans want.